Mozilla Corporation

Readers' comments 10

Left under the original article, as archived; 1 page of comments could not be recovered.

• 

  nicomen

  Netscape II - It's pissed and it's after you!
• 

  Jakub81

  Yeah, the whole Mozilla IS Netscape 2. Look at the Mozilla's board of directors names. And we must remeber these guys "invented" <blink> and <font> tags. More evil than M$.
• 

  Think

  what will all the developers think?
• 

  Kelson

  So the years of standards evangelism from Mozilla-the-organization don't count?
• 

  Sigup

  Mozilla:
  
  *Words: "Standards compliance!"
  *Action: *Implements non-standard Gecko extensions for web devs to use*
  
  *Words: "Hooray, we are nice people and all!"
  *Action: *Underhanded dirt slinging, FUD and lies against competitors*
  
  But there's good news! Maybe this will finally force the Asa troll to shut up...
• 

  haavard

  That's not exactly what I was talking about. More like they need to keep their focus and not let "easy solutions" ruin everything. As a commercial entity they will hopefully continue to promote open standards and avoid mistakes that a lot of companies make.
  
  Hopefully they, like Opera, will contribute even more to the W3C and similar organizations. Opera has several employees that are paid by us to work at the W3C (and WHATWG for that matter). As a commercial entity, they might be able to put real money behind open standards like Opera does. Although they surely contribute already of course.
• 

  Kelson

  Non-standard extensions are bad. Got it. Better get rid of Opera's -o-link, -o-source, and similar properties, then.
  
  What? They're intended for internal use by the application only? Why, gosh, so are -moz-border-radius and the like!
  
  Speaking of FUD...
• 

  Kelson

  OK, that makes sense.
• 

  Sigup

  I'm not talking about stuff that's clearly marked as "internal use only". More like stuff like XMLHttpRequest.
• 

  porneL

  Which is useful and Opera implements it?