Developers › A Journal from Behind the Trenches
Same number of users, yet wildly different market share for Opera and Opera Mini?
Net Applications reports an increase in market share for both Opera Mini and Opera (desktop) in December 2009. What's odd is that Opera for desktop is reported as having a market share of 2.40%, while Opera Mini has a mere 0.53%.
You may recall that the desktop version was reported as having 45 million users early in December 2009, while Opera Mini had nearly 42 million users in November 2009. Presumably, that number grew somewhat in December, and I wouldn't be surprised if Opera Mini has closed the gap to the desktop version even more.
With these numbers in mind it's quite odd that the desktop version has a reported global market share which is several times higher than that of Opera Mini.
This is far from the first case of market share oddity. Around the time we reported 45 million users for the desktop version late last year, Google announced that Chrome had reached 40 million users. Despite Opera's higher number of users, Net Applications reported Chrome has having a market share which was nearly twice as high as Opera's.
StatCounter reported a market share for Chrome hich was more than two times higher than Opera in November and December 2009.
There must be something really odd about the way Net Applications, StatCounter and other statistics providers are handling browser statistics.
It's too bad that people are using such flawed statistics as a basis for browser related decisions.
Readers' comments 14
Left under the original article, as archived.
About this article
| Published in | A Journal from Behind the Trenches |
|---|---|
| Date | January 2, 2010 |
| Author | Haavard |
| Tags | stats, browser stats, net applications, hitslink, statcounter, chrome |
| Original | Internet Archive |
endless loveSunday, January 3, 2010 12:05:58 AM
Daniel HendrycksSunday, January 3, 2010 1:03:05 AM
Originally posted by haavard:
*Typo*
Rafael LuikSunday, January 3, 2010 6:32:15 AM
Does the search / bookmarks partners pay less to you because of these "flawed statistics"?
J. MauriceSunday, January 3, 2010 6:38:18 AM
beeblebroSunday, January 3, 2010 8:24:22 AM
Sami SerolaSunday, January 3, 2010 8:44:16 AM
HitsLink looks very odd because they seem to compare mobile Opera Mini browser with desktop browsers. Does this mean there are desktop and mobile Safari browsers bundled together? If Opera Mini has 0.53% share compared to desktop browsers, then I would say it's rather huge because the share of mobile users is still very small compared to desktop users.
What comes to mobile browsers, stats based on visits does not give stats for browsers faking their user agent. Therefore these statistics should always be seen only as giving a "very general estimate".
Tomas ThorsteinssonSunday, January 3, 2010 11:20:10 AM
PurdiSunday, January 3, 2010 2:57:35 PM
Originally posted by rafaelluik:
What on earth are you talking about? If people decide not to support Opera because of bogus stats, THAT is a bad thing for Opera.
PurdiSunday, January 3, 2010 2:58:29 PM
Originally posted by tth:
How about educating yourself instead of spouting nonsense? Net Applications clearly state that they are counting unique visitors and not page views:
"The site unique visitor and referral information is summarized on a monthly, weekly, daily and hourly basis."
BTW, Opera Mini is the ONLY way a lot of people can use the web.
Charles SchlossSunday, January 3, 2010 4:49:33 PM
Daniel HendrycksSunday, January 3, 2010 6:35:46 PM
Originally posted by beeblebro:
Users that check for updates. (Automatically (every threee hours) or manually)
Cutting SpoonTuesday, January 5, 2010 6:43:32 PM
Charles SchlossTuesday, January 5, 2010 8:07:23 PM
Cutting SpoonWednesday, January 6, 2010 10:05:43 PM